The Wealth of Nations Adam Smith ; Introduction by Alan B. Krueger ; Edited, With Notes and Marginal Summary, by Edwin Cannan
著者 Adam Smith
購入できます
東京から発送
国内無料配送
海外配送
配送時間とあなたの国への
配送料
の確認
出版社: | Random House |
発売日: | 04-Mar-2003 |
ISBN: | 0553585975 |
ISBN13: | 9780553585971 |
形式: | Paperback |
重量: | 715 gms |
書誌情報: | pp. xxv + 1231 |
書籍タイトル "The Wealth of Nations" 著者 Adam Smith. こちらの書籍が発行された年 2003. 書籍ISBN番号 0553585975|9780553585971 このタイトルは Paperback バージョンに割り当てられます この書籍の出版社はこちらです Random House. 当サイトにはこちらの出版社から 94480 冊の素晴らしい書籍がございます
1. Many of the concepts developed by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations-the nature of free trade, laissez-faire, the division of labor-were revolutionary notions in 1776, and remain central to contemporary liberal economic thought. Discuss contemporary economics in light of some of the key notions elaborated by Smith.
2. Smith famously writes: “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love. . . .” What does Smith mean by “self-love” or “self-interest”?
3. As R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner write, The Wealth of Nations “was not only an intellectual achievement . . . embracing as it does the explanation of complex social relations on the basis of a few principles, but also a work which provided practical prescriptions for the problems of the day.” Discuss these aspects of Smith’s work-analytical and prescriptive or historical; what is their relation? Is the one necessary for an appreciation of the other?
4. In his Introduction to this volume, Robert Reich notes that “The Wealth of Nations is resolutely about human beings-their capacities and incentives to be productive, their overall well-being, and the connection between productivity and well-being.” How does this statement, taken as a point of departure, shed light on Smith’s book and its significance?
5. Although he is considered the founder of political economy (or modern economic thought more generally), Adam Smith considered himself a moral philosopher. How does looking at him in this way-as someone fundamentally concerned with questions of ethics-change your understanding or appreciation of his work?From the Trade Paperback edition.